
The early voting surge in the 2026 midterm elections has already passed 30 million ballots with a week still to go before Election Day, according to the University of Florida's Election Lab, and the sharpest increases are concentrated exactly where control of the Senate will be decided. Voters in Texas, Kansas, Maine, North Carolina and Ohio — five states where Democrats are trying to flip Republican-held Senate seats — are casting early ballots at rates far above the same point in 2022, turning what is usually a slow build toward November into a fast-moving test of enthusiasm, organisation and frustration with the cost of living.
The headline number arrived on Tuesday, October 27, when the Election Lab's running count passed 30 million early votes. That count covers ballots cast in person before Election Day and mail ballots already returned, and it landed a week before voters go to the polls on November 3 to elect all 435 members of the House of Representatives, about one-third of the Senate, governors in 39 states and thousands of state legislators. The sheer scale is striking for a midterm: with seven days of voting still to come in most states, the early total alone already amounts to a substantial share of a typical midterm electorate.
The state-by-state picture, drawn from an Associated Press analysis of data through October 20 — two weeks before Election Day — explains why campaign strategists are paying such close attention. Kansas recorded 55,500 early ballots at that cutoff, against 27,300 in 2022, an increase of 103%. Texas recorded 956,400, up 74% from 549,600. Maine reached 136,000, a 39% rise from 97,800. North Carolina had 733,100, up 38% from 530,200. Ohio recorded 676,800, up 30% from 520,100. The AP matched early in-person ballots and returned absentee ballots at the same cutoff across the two cycles, so the comparison is like-for-like rather than a quirk of different reporting dates.
Not every battleground is surging. The AP found early-vote totals in Michigan and Georgia broadly similar to 2022, while Iowa's total was down about 6% at the same point. Both Michigan and Georgia shattered their midterm voting records in 2022, the AP noted, with reproductive rights on the ballot in Michigan and a fiercely competitive Senate race in Georgia that year, so holding level there is a high bar in itself. Iowa, which has voted three times for Donald Trump in presidential years, has competitive contests for governor, Senate and three of its four House districts, yet its early vote was running behind the 2022 pace.
What ties the five surging states together is the Senate map. Democrats are trying to flip a Republican-held Senate seat in each of Texas, Kansas, Maine, North Carolina and Ohio, and in most of them Republicans accounted for a smaller share of advance voters than they did four years ago, according to the AP. The Texas Secretary of State's dashboard does not identify returned ballots by party registration, so the party-share finding rests on the states where that breakdown is available, and it must be read with that limit in mind.
Midterm elections are historically the moment when voters pass judgement on the party in power, and 2026 fits that pattern in an unusually sharp form. Republicans control both chambers of Congress and the White House, whereas in 2022 Democrats held the White House and the Senate. Analysts have long observed that midterms typically favour the party out of power in Washington, and the AP analysis frames the early-voting surge against exactly that shift in the political weather. The increase also partly reflects practical changes since 2022: a few additional states have expanded early voting opportunities, and more states are making their data available, which lifts the national comparison even before voter enthusiasm is counted.
The Senate arithmetic explains the stakes. The chamber currently lists 53 Republicans, 45 Democrats and two independents, so Democrats must gain seats to take control, while Republicans must defend a map that has unexpectedly widened. The five surging states are all Republican-held seats that Democrats are contesting, and several of them were not expected to be competitive at the start of the cycle. In Kansas, Democrat Adam Hamilton, a pastor, is challenging Republican Senator Roger Marshall in a state that has not elected a Democratic senator since 1932. In Texas, Democrat James Talarico, a Christian progressive, faces Trump-backed Attorney General Ken Paxton in a longtime Republican stronghold that has become one of the closest-watched contests in the country. In North Carolina, former Democratic governor Roy Cooper faces Republican operative Michael Whatley for the seat being vacated by retiring Senator Thom Tillis. In Ohio, former Democratic senator Sherrod Brown is seeking a comeback against Republican Jon Husted, who was appointed to replace JD Vance when he became vice president. In Maine, Republican Susan Collins faces former state Senate leader Troy Jackson, in a state that votes Democratic for president but has repeatedly returned Collins.
The AP also pointed to the issues driving the mood: dissatisfaction with President Donald Trump's tariffs, the persistently high cost of living, and high petrol and diesel prices caused by the Iran war, which it said had generated political blowback against Republicans in places the party did not anticipate having to defend this year. The ballot figures themselves do not establish whether those issues prompted any individual voter to vote early, and the AP was careful to say so, but the pattern of where the surge is strongest — in Republican-held seats — is consistent with an electorate in which opposition voters are the most motivated to bank their votes early.
Texas is the largest prize and the largest increase in raw votes. Its 956,400 early ballots by October 20 already exceeded the entire early total of most states, and the 74% jump from 549,600 in 2022 came despite Texas having no party registration on its returned-ballot dashboard, which means the surge cannot be assigned to either party from the state data alone. The contest itself has drawn enormous outside attention and money, and it sits at the centre of the national debate over whether a longtime Republican stronghold can genuinely change hands in a midterm.
Kansas is the most dramatic percentage story. More than doubling, from 27,300 to 55,500, is a small absolute number by Texas standards, but in a state where Senate races are usually decided by wide margins, a doubling of early participation signals an electorate that is paying unusually close attention. The same logic applies in Maine, where 136,000 early ballots against 97,800 four years ago reflects a small state with a long tradition of high turnout, and where Collins has repeatedly survived difficult elections by building a personal brand distinct from her party.
North Carolina and Ohio are the two states where the surge may matter most for the final Senate maths, because both are large, genuinely competitive, and rich in electoral votes as well as Senate significance. North Carolina's 733,100 early ballots, up from 530,200, and Ohio's 676,800, up from 520,100, show broad-based participation rather than a single-city phenomenon. Ohio also carries a procedural change worth noting for voters still holding a mail ballot: a law that took effect on March 20 requires regular mail ballots to reach county election boards by Election Day, ending a four-day grace period that applied in the previous cycle.
Taken together, the five states tell a coherent story: the early vote is not rising evenly across the country, it is rising fastest where the Senate is most directly at stake. That concentration is what makes the AP analysis more than a turnout curiosity. It suggests campaigns on both sides have succeeded in getting their most motivated supporters to vote early, and it raises the question of how much of the remaining electorate is still to come, and who those late voters will be.
The Associated Press, whose election services team compiled the analysis, presented the figures as a snapshot of potential voter enthusiasm rather than a forecast, and that caution has been echoed by other analysts. The totals show when ballots were cast or returned, not which candidates voters chose, and early-voting totals are an unreliable predictor of final results, in part because people who vote early tend to be more politically engaged than the electorate as a whole. That warning matters most in a cycle where one party's voters may simply be banking their votes sooner, leaving the other party's supporters to vote closer to, or on, Election Day itself.
The AURN report that carried the Election Lab's 30-million figure on Tuesday struck a similar note, observing that the early totals suggest strong participation but do not establish which candidates are ahead. It also noted that millions of Americans are voting early even as the administration's election-related actions have raised concerns about voter intimidation, a tension that has run through the final weeks of the campaign and that both parties have used to motivate their own supporters.
For Democrats, the surge in Republican-held seats is encouraging but incomplete evidence: it shows their target states are engaged, yet it does not show that the new early voters are theirs, and the smaller Republican share of advance voters in most of those states could partly reflect a shift in when Republicans vote rather than whether they vote. For Republicans, the same numbers are a warning and a reassurance at once: a warning that Democratic-leaning states are turning out early in large numbers, and a reassurance that Election Day itself, when their voters have traditionally turned out in force, is still to come. Neither side can claim the early vote as a result, and both know it.
The early voting surge matters for three reasons. First, it changes campaign strategy in the final week. Once a voter has cast a ballot, campaigns stop spending money trying to persuade them and redirect it to the shrinking pool of people who have not yet voted. A 30-million-strong early electorate therefore means the final week's advertising, canvassing and rallies are aimed at a smaller, harder-to-reach audience, which raises the value of every remaining undecided voter.
Second, it shapes expectations for Election Night itself. If a large share of the vote is already banked, results in states that count early ballots first will arrive sooner, while states that count mail ballots late may still swing after midnight. Voters should therefore expect a night in which some races look settled early and others move as the count continues, and that pattern is normal rather than a sign of trouble.
Third, and most importantly, it is a measure of democratic participation in a midterm that many voters once treated as a low-turnout affair. More than 30 million early votes a week before Election Day, against 9 million at the comparable point in 2022 for the early and mail categories combined, suggests that the habit of voting early, formed in the pandemic era, has become permanent for a large part of the electorate. Whether that habit ultimately helps one party or the other will only be known when the votes are counted, but the habit itself is now a defining feature of American elections.
The calendar from here is short and fixed. Early voting continues in most states through the end of this week, with deadlines varying by state, and voters holding mail ballots should check their local election authority for the exact return deadline — in Ohio, remember, the ballot must arrive by Election Day itself. Election Day is Tuesday, November 3, when polls open across the country and the remaining in-person vote is cast.
After the polls close, the count begins, and the first results will come from states that process early ballots before Election Day. Senate control may not be known on the night itself if any of the five surging states are close, and recounts or late-counted mail ballots could extend the wait in the tightest races. Campaigns will also watch the final early-voting totals, due over the coming days, for any sign of a late surge in states such as Michigan, Georgia and Iowa, where the early pace has so far been flat or down.
The next big data point will be the Election Lab's final pre-election count, which will show how close the early total came to the full 2022 midterm turnout, and whether the surge in the five battleground states held through the final weekend. Until then, the only certainty is the one the analysts keep repeating: a lot of Americans have already voted, and a lot more are about to.
More than 30 million Americans had voted early as of October 27, 2026, according to the University of Florida's Election Lab, one week before Election Day on November 3.
At the October 20 cutoff in the Associated Press analysis, Kansas more than doubled to 55,500 ballots from 27,300 in 2022, Texas rose 74% to 956,400 from 549,600, Maine rose 39% to 136,000, North Carolina rose 38% to 733,100, and Ohio rose 30% to 676,800.
No. Early totals show when ballots were cast or returned, not which candidates voters chose, and analysts warn that early voting is an unreliable predictor of final results because early voters tend to be more politically engaged.
Democrats are trying to flip Republican-held Senate seats in Texas, Kansas, Maine, North Carolina and Ohio, and the Senate currently stands at 53 Republicans, 45 Democrats and two independents, so gains in these states could decide control of the chamber.
Election Day is Tuesday, November 3, 2026. Mail voters should check their local deadline, because rules vary by state; in Ohio, a law that took effect on March 20 requires regular mail ballots to reach county election boards by Election Day, ending a previous four-day grace period.
Related coverage on US News Pulse: Trump Texas rallies: Paxton, methane plan and a Talarico surge on Oct. 27 and Trump $5,000 dividend promise back in spotlight seven days before midterms.